[OpenAFS] sgi_65: anyone still using inode fileserver?
Chaz Chandler
clc31@inbox.com
Sat, 3 Oct 2009 08:17:49 -0800
I'm hoping to prompt a discussion about sane defaults for this platform. =
From=20a conversation with the one other person I've found on this list =
who (still) runs openafs on IRIX, this was a =22known=22 issue. If not, I =
will submit a bug. If so, why is it the default config?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shadow=40gmail.com
> Sent: Sat, 3 Oct 2009 03:39:49 -0400
> To: clc31=40inbox.com
> Subject: Re: =5BOpenAFS=5D sgi_65: anyone still using inode fileserver?
>=20
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Chaz Chandler <clc31=40inbox.com> wrote:
>> After an unpleasant experience with the default (inode) sgi_65 package,
>=20
> For which I'll find a bug in RT, right?
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info=40openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info