[OpenAFS] Openafs failover
Matt W. Benjamin
matt@linuxbox.com
Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:07:24 -0400 (EDT)
Hi Tom,
I recall mentioning in Ohio, XCB doesn't have a private view of client callback state. I'm unsure it's a good tradeoff to serialize XCB messages for "reliable delivery." You would be changing the goal from "consistency is preserved" to "clients don't need to update their cache" on failover--at potentially very high cost, no?
Matt
----- "Tom Keiser" <tkeiser@sinenomine.net> wrote:
Secondly,
> there's the question of whether extended callback data should be
> serialized or not (at present, dafs+osi+xcb does not dump xcb data;
> it
> would not be particularly hard to add support in future).
--
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
http://linuxbox.com
tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309