[OpenAFS] Openafs failover

Matt W. Benjamin matt@linuxbox.com
Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:07:24 -0400 (EDT)


Hi Tom,

I recall mentioning in Ohio, XCB doesn't have a private view of client callback state.  I'm unsure it's a good tradeoff to serialize XCB messages for "reliable delivery."  You would be changing the goal from "consistency is preserved" to "clients don't need to update their cache" on failover--at potentially very high cost, no?

Matt


----- "Tom Keiser" <tkeiser@sinenomine.net> wrote:

Secondly,
> there's the question of whether extended callback data should be
> serialized or not (at present, dafs+osi+xcb does not dump xcb data;
> it
> would not be particularly hard to add support in future).
-- 

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309