[OpenAFS] Re: Ubik problem

Andrew Deason adeason@sinenomine.net
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:11:29 -0500

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 08:43:47 +0300 (EEST)
Atro Tossavainen <atro.tossavainen+openafs@helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Andrew,
> > Atro's problem appears to be that they are advertising the extra
> > addresses, though, not that they're sending packets out over them.
> What I don't get is why this would have changed transparently on the
> sun4x_58 server when I changed the *other* db server from sun4x_58 to
> sunx86_510 and from IBM AFS to OpenAFS.

Isn't the sunx86_510 server the one that's reporting extra addresses?
>From this:

>>> sunx86_510 # /usr/afs/bin/udebug 7002 -long
>>> Host's addresses are:

It just looks like OpenAFS will (currently) ignore NetRestrict lines
with an 'M' in front as a parse error. So your upgraded sunx86_510
machine does not restrict those addresses, and advertises the private
ones. Some of those are lower than the IPs of the sun4x_58 box, so the
sunx86_510 box looks like the new "lowest IP" server.

Andrew Deason