[OpenAFS] Happy Holidays -- Another year in the life of OpenAFS
chas williams - CONTRACTOR
Fri, 23 Dec 2011 08:48:51 -0500
i would hazard that content is more important than 'ease of use'. it
really doesnt matter if you can carry the manual with you if it doesnt
provide any useful help.
there is nothing to prevent the current docbook from being rendered
into "quarto" (i suspect you meant folio since quarto would be hard to
use without cutting and binding). you could just do it by simply
post-processing the .pdf with pdfnup. if you feel there is something
specific missing, please open a bug. i know we are currently missing
an index for the manual pages -- it got lost in the conversion.
we also have .epub and .mobi (kindle) versions of the manuals available
(generated from the same docbook/pod that is generating the .pdf
and .html) for those that have moved beyond the whole dead trees thing.
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:51:39 -0800
Ted Creedon <email@example.com> wrote:
> Its not the docs content, just the formatting and ease of use.
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Jeffrey Altman <
> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On 12/22/2011 8:54 PM, David Boyes wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. Recreated the IBM format including hyperlinks, appendix, permuted
> > >>> index,
> > >>> Etc
> > >
> > > I have the original doc tools used to create the IBM docs, and the
> > ability
> > > to produce and translate the .boo files. These tools can automagically do
> > > the above if asked.
> > All of our documentation is now in Docbook. They include hyperlinks,
> > the appendix, index, etc. The original IBM docs are of little interest
> > in 2011.
> > Jeffrey Altman