[OpenAFS] Future of maemo port?

[Jason Edgecombe]

The hardest part will likely be getting a development environment 
installed. There might be a forum or web site to support hacking on the 
Dlink.

you can also get help from the debian-arm email list: 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-arm/

On 12/23/2011 11:16 AM, Ted Creedon wrote:
> Just another side project.
>
> I need 3 AFS Appliances. They're cheap reliable, easy to maintain and
> transportable. Actually I could use several..
>
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Jason Edgecombe<jason@rampaginggeek.com>wrote:
>
>> I don't think that I'll be able to help much with that.
>>
>>
>> On 12/23/2011 12:55 AM, Ted Creedon wrote:
>>
>>> AFS as an add on to he Dllink would suit me fine and allow shutting down 3
>>> servers
>>>
>>> If a larger capacity circuit board is needed, that's not a a problm.
>>>
>>> maybe I'll have time after Jan 1.
>>>
>>> tedc
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:20 PM, Jason Edgecombe<jason@rampaginggeek.**
>>> com<jason@rampaginggeek.com>>wrote:
>>>
>>>   Hi Ted,
>>>> Other ARM devices, like the D-Link, that run Linux have a good chance to
>>>> run OpenAFS. debian-arm does exist. I'm just wanted to formally deprecate
>>>> the maemo code, which has been unmaintained for a while.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/22/2011 01:02 PM, Ted Creedon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   The Dlink DNS-320 NAS has an 800 MHz ARM + 128M of memory
>>>>> If it could be ported, that would be ideal
>>>>>
>>>>> I've requested the GPL build tree from Dlink
>>>>>
>>>>> I would not be adverse to sponsoring part of a project to provide a
>>>>> replacement board for same.
>>>>>
>>>>> tedc
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Jason Edgecombe<jason@rampaginggeek.**
>>>>> **
>>>>> com<jason@rampaginggeek.com>>**wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   Hi Everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there any objections to removing the maemo port project from the
>>>>>> wiki?
>>>>>> Should it be replaced by something else? Maemo is dead and I have no
>>>>>> clue
>>>>>> about Meego, its successor. I haven't touched the Maemo port in a
>>>>>> couple
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> years, and I have no device to develop or test on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What mobile platforms does it make sense to (hopefully) spend effort
>>>>>> on?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Insights? Comments?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Jason
>>>>>> ______________________________******_________________
>>>>>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>>>>>> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>>>>>> https://lists.openafs.org/******mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/****mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>>>>> <**https://lists.openafs.org/****mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/**mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>>>>> <**https://lists.openafs.org/****mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/**mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>>>>> **<https://lists.openafs.org/**mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>>>>>   ______________________________****_________________
>>>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>>>> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>>>> https://lists.openafs.org/****mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/**mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>>> <**https://lists.openafs.org/**mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>> https://lists.openafs.org/**mailman/listinfo/openafs-info<https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info>
>>