Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR)
Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:41:28 -0400
In message <D246EBED-BCC4-488D-846A-B4E80EDA91BA@desy.de>,Peter van der Reest writes:
>PS: I personally do not see the need for a name change on our part, CODA
>could have a codabackup?
as you may know, coda and afs share a common ancestry so i am surpised
this is the only name conflict. apparently coda did prefix most things
with a c but didnt to do so on backup. coda should probably change
backup to cbackup to be consistent but we cant force them to do anything.