[Fwd: Re: [OpenAFS] OpenAFS Backups]
Thu, 17 Mar 2011 07:29:27 -0400
On Mar 17, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Harald Barth wrote:
>> Not sure why anyone would want to use anything other than Teradactyl.
> 1. $$
I keep hearing this - but quite frankly find Teradactyl quite
I think much of this depends on the size of the cell.
> 2. Integration with existing system and tape robot lacking.
> At the time we were running TSM and DMF against the same
> tape robot and did not want a third system "fighting" for
> tape drives.
I'm not sure this has anything to do with the use of Teradactyl but
instead the complexity of your backup environment. If you're using
TSM you'll find Teradactyl a real bargain ;-)
> Another option is to use the software written by Anders Magnusson
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> which does per file backups to TSM. We do only per
> volume backups.