[OpenAFS] Re: NetRestrict ignored

[Sergio Gelato]

* Andrew Deason [2012-06-18 10:30:28 -0500]:
> NetRestrict(5) still mentions that specifying 255 acts as a wildcard.
> 80fc888a9223050481de932233fe7121a48df194 removed one mention of that,
> but the other remains; should both of them have been removed?

That was the impression I got when I last looked at this (cf. #125340), yes.

For the purposes of the present discussion, however, it's enough to notice
that the remaining mention of 255 as a wildcard is in the "Client NetRestrict"
section, so it doesn't apply anyway.