[OpenAFS] Re: [OpenAFS-devel] rxgk development has been funded
Matt W. Benjamin
Tue, 30 Oct 2012 23:19:07 -0400 (EDT)
I don't think that's what Troy meant.
At any rate, he -might- have meant he presumed there would be no interest in standardizing rxk5 unless it turned out to be something that a significant number of real sites wanted to use.
----- "Gary Buhrmaster" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Troy Benjegerdes <email@example.com>
> > What are the missing pieces needed to deploy RxK5?
> > I am going to start with the assumption that it will not
> > pass the standards process until after there are several
> > people running it in production.
> Please read https://www.ietf.org/about/process-docs.html
> Standards are not "I am running it in production, bless it now",
> it is more like a long term negotiation (with a lot of work
> along the way).
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI 48104