[OpenAFS] buildbot and packages
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 11:39:30 -0400
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Troy Benjegerdes <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > However, this requires having a much greater availability of release
>> > management and testing resources.
>> And perhaps an argument for automated tests that could prove out a relea=
>> If you mean manual testing resources, given the scope of platform suppor=
t and myriad branches for OpenAFS I doubt 'enough' will ever be enough :) =
If we could bend those resources to creating and maintaining functional tes=
ts then that might be a better use of time. Definitely a challenge though.
> All this talk about 'reliable code for our users' is total BS
> until 'make check' actually does some realisitic functionality tests.
> If you can't write an automated test for a feature, they I would
> request we consider disabling that feature.
You have TFS forked. I suggest trying that approach and seeing what
kind of filesystem you are left with.
It will probably not involve kernel extensions.