[OpenAFS] buildbot and packages

Matt W. Benjamin matt@linuxbox.com
Mon, 17 Sep 2012 14:51:24 -0400 (EDT)


Hi,

Well, we used the fuse rather extensively for locking and dirformat testing.  It's experimental, but science experiment might be a little strong.

Matt

----- "Russ Allbery" <rra@stanford.edu> wrote:

> Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@hozed.org> writes:
> 
> > I'm looking to get all the low-hanging fruit with unskilled
> testing.
> > Particularly with regressions like this:
> 
> > hozer@six:~/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse$
> /home/hozer/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse/../../src/afsd/afsd.fuse
> -dynroot -fakestat -d -confdir
> /home/hozer/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse/conf -cachedir
> /home/hozer/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse/vcache -mountdir
> /home/hozer/src/openafs-fuse-git/tests/fuse/mntdir
> > FUSE library version: 2.8.6
> > nullpath_ok: 0
> > unique: 1, opcode: INIT (26), nodeid: 0, insize: 56
> > INIT: 7.17
> > flags=0x0000047b
> > max_readahead=0x00020000
> > Starting AFS cache scan...found 0 non-empty cache files (0%).
> > afsd: All AFS daemons started.
> > Segmentation fault
> 
> The fuse code currently in the tree was primarily a science experiment
> by
> one developer and is not something that's really ready for production
> use.
> That's not to say this isn't a regression, and of course it would be
> nice
> to fix, but I'm completely unsurprised that it has issues.  So far as
> I
> know, no one is currently actively using the fuse code.
> 
> -- 
> Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)            
> <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info

-- 
Matt Benjamin
The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309