[OpenAFS] Server disk operations speed
Mon, 8 Apr 2013 22:44:52 +0300 (EEST)
Thanks, this + Andrew's reply anwers my doubts. But for the sake of
troubleshooting/adventure, I tried storebehind. To my surprise there
wasn't much difference in the performance. I'm happy with that - keeps me
away from dangerous temptations.
> On 4/8/13 14:09 , "firstname.lastname@example.org"
> <email@example.com> wrote:
>>understanding the depths of afs - isn't the afs cache meant to be always
>>in sync with the server, or is it possible (default?) for the
>>to let go the data before it is confirmed to exist on the server? That
>>if my configuration somehow forces the sync against the default, that
>>could explain the poor performance. Sorry for asking stupid guestions...
> There is "fs storebehind" but I don't think that could explain this.