[OpenAFS] About `dafileserver` vs `fileserver` differences (for small cells)

Ciprian Dorin Craciun ciprian.craciun@gmail.com
Sat, 9 Mar 2019 12:04:04 +0200

On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 11:43 AM Harald Barth <haba@kth.se> wrote:
> > However is it still "safe" and "advised" (outside of these
> > disadvantages) to run the old `fileserver` component?
> I would recommend everyone to migrate to "da" and not recommend to
> start with anything old. For obvious reasons, all the big
> installations will migrate to "da" and you don't want to run another
> codebase, don't you?

Thanks Harald for the feedback.

This is exactly what I wanted to find out, namely if the `fileserver`
and `dafileserver` have different code bases.  (And you've confirmed
my hunch that the DAFS codebase is the currently maintained one.)