[AFS3-std] A call for consensus on draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07

[Tony D'Amato]

I have read the document, I have no issues with it.
--
Tony D'Amato, SCSA
Senior UNIX Systems Administrator
Server Support Group
Office of Computing and Communications Services
Old Dominion University


afs3-standardization-request@openafs.org wrote:
> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 13:07:29 -0600
> From: "Douglas E. Engert"<deengert@anl.gov>
> Subject: [AFS3-std] A call for consensus on
> 	draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07
> To: afs3-standardization@openafs.org
> Message-ID:<4CFE85F1.6080208@anl.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07
>
> Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week,
> and this being the first, I would like extend that to Thursday
> December 16.
>
> Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement
> by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues.
> If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group
> should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making
> the point is having trouble expressing the issue.
>
> Members should read the document and if you have issues please state
> them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let
> us know that too.
>
> Please respond using the subject from this e-mail.
>
>