[AFS3-std] A call for consensus on draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07

[Kim Kimball]

I have no issues.

Kim


On 12/16/2010 10:06 AM, Steven Jenkins wrote:
> ...
>> On 12/13/2010 1:00 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>>> We are in the middle of a call for consensus, ending on December 16.
>>> So far no one has responded either way. As stated below: "If you have
>>> no issues, let us know that too."
>>>
>>> On 12/7/2010 1:07 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>>>> We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on:
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names-07
>>>>
>>>> Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week,
>>>> and this being the first, I would like extend that to Thursday
>>>> December 16.
>>>>
>>>> Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement
>>>> by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues.
>>>> If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group
>>>> should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making
>>>> the point is having trouble expressing the issue.
>>>>
>>>> Members should read the document and if you have issues please state
>>>> them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let
>>>> us know that too.
>>>>
> I have read the document and have no issues.
>
> Steven Jenkins
> _______________________________________________
> AFS3-standardization mailing list
> AFS3-standardization@openafs.org
> http://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/afs3-standardization
>