[AFS3-std] AFS Standardisation
Jake Thebault-Spieker
summatusmentis@gmail.com
Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:09:19 -0400
------=_Part_34323_19478749.1219248559992
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
>
> Am I the only one who has been finding this too damn complicated?
>
> My suggestion: Every time we need to standardize something in AFS, we
> lock the Jeffs, Derrick, and Russ in a room. Anyone who objects to this
> process gets locked in the room with them. No one is allowed to leave
> the room until the appropriate document is completed. We can call this
> the "Steel Cage Match" process.
>
This might be a good plan, until we have a freak accident wherein a city bus
somehow finds itself launched into the room, and there are no survivors.
> The Registrars are specified in the proposal as:
> "The registrars would be initially comprised of the current registrar,
> plus a representative from each of the currently available AFS
> implementations (IBM, OpenAFS, kAFS and Arla)"
>
Actually, valid point raised above. Suppose there aren't representatives
available/willing/able to represent one or more of the current AFS
implementations?
--
Jacob Thebault-Spieker
Cell: (320) 288-6412
http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com
------=_Part_34323_19478749.1219248559992
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
Am I the only one who has been finding this too damn complicated?<br>
<br>
My suggestion: Every time we need to standardize something in AFS, we<br>
lock the Jeffs, Derrick, and Russ in a room. Anyone who objects to this<br>
process gets locked in the room with them. No one is allowed to leave<br>
the room until the appropriate document is completed. We can call this<br>
the "Steel Cage Match" process.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>This might be a good plan, until we have a freak accident wherein a
city bus somehow finds itself launched into the room, and there are no
survivors.<br clear="all">
</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div>The Registrars are specified in the proposal as:<br>
"The registrars would be initially comprised of the current registrar,<br>
plus a representative from each of the currently available AFS<br>
implementations (IBM, OpenAFS, kAFS and Arla)"</div></blockquote></div><br>Actually, valid point raised above. Suppose there aren't representatives available/willing/able to represent one or more of the current AFS implementations?<br>
-- <br>Jacob Thebault-Spieker<br>Cell: (320) 288-6412<br><a href="http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com">http://summatusmentis.wordpress.com</a><br>
</div>
------=_Part_34323_19478749.1219248559992--