[AFS3-std] Quota for max. number of files per volumes
Alf Wachsmann
alfw@slac.stanford.edu
Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> Simon Wilkinson wrote:
>> Rather than overloading existing fields (especially in the case of
>> returning two values bitpacked into MinQuota), I think it's more
>> valuable to consider the RPC changes necessary to support this as a
>> first class feature.
This is as expected ;-)
>> I will leave others to speak to the desirability of using the MinQuota
>> portion of the volume header - I've got no idea how widespread other
>> uses for this field may be.
>
> While I am not opposed to the feature, I am opposed to overloading
> existing fields.
I am curious whether the existing MinQuota field is used at all.
Why not reuse a field that is not used?
Re-using this field has the added advantage that the new on-disk format
is compatible with the old one. I.e. you can mix new and old servers.
The same applies to volume dumps.
-- Alf.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alf Wachsmann | e-mail: alfw@slac.stanford.edu
SLAC - Scientific Computing | Phone: +1-650-926-4802
2575 Sand Hill Road, M/S 97 | FAX: +1-650-926-3329
Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA | Office: Bldg. 50/323
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~alfw (PGP)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------