[AFS3-std] Re: New version of the 64-bit time I-D (-02)

Andrew Deason adeason@sinenomine.net
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 11:27:53 -0500


On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 12:36:20 -0500
Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net> wrote:

> On Tue, 31 May 2011 14:39:47 -0500
> Andrew Deason <adeason@sinenomine.net> wrote:
> 
> > draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02 has been posted and is available at
> > 
> > <http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/>
> 
> Second call for review; any comments welcomed.

Last call for review. After this, I believe a chair makes a call for
consensus? Or do I need to formally "propose" a call for consensus and a
chair carries it out? (Do I need to "do" anything here, assuming no
further comments or substantive changes in the doc?)

-- 
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net