[AFS3-std] A call for consensus on draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02

[Mykyta Yevstifeyev]

21.07.2011 8:20, Simon Wilkinson wrote
> On 21 Jul 2011, at 06:00, Mykyta Yevstifeyev<evnikita2@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Reading this draft, I don't actually understand why you chose to publish it as RFC.
> We're using the Independent Submissions stream for afs3 documents. See RFC4846 for details of this stream, and it's purpose.
I've read RFC 4846 and have noticed you're using Independent Submissions 
stream.  Probably, the draft should be clearer regarding relationships 
with currently deployed Internet protocols/technologies, since your 
document "at the first glance" seems to be a bit irrelevant for the RFC 
series.  The counter conclusion may only be made by people who are 
involved in the AFS development and other contiguous technologies (whom 
I don't belong to), which makes the document not as readable as 
desired.  A good background placed in the Introduction is a good way to 
resolve the issue.

Mykyta