[AFS3-std] A call for consensus on draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02

[Douglas E. Engert]

Based on all the discussions of the last few days, there are enough
questions and concern that in the option of this chair, there is no
consensus for draft-deason-afs3-type-time-02.

We will need to continue the discussions, and make changes in the
next draft.


On 7/26/2011 8:25 AM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
> This call for consensus was to extend to 7/25 yesterday.
> So far I have only seen 2 "OK" responses from Derrick Brashear
> and David Boyes, and a "why are we doing this" from an outsider.
>
> In the view of this chair, that does not constitute a consensus,
> and I will extend the call till Friday 7/29.
>
>
> On 7/15/2011 1:11 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>> We have a request to proceed with a call for consensus on:
>>
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deason-afs3-type-time/
>>
>>
>> Our draft procedures say a call should last at least 1 week,
>> and this being Friday afternoon, I would like to extend the
>> period to Monday, 7/25/2011.
>>
>>
>> Consensus as used by the IETF is not a vote but a general agreement
>> by the working group that the draft has addressed all issues.
>> If there is someone who strongly disagrees with some issue the group
>> should make ever effort to understand the issue even if the one making
>> the point is having trouble expressing the issue.
>>
>> Members should read the document and if you have issues please state
>> them and indicate what needs to be changed. If you have no issues, let
>> us know that too.
>>
>> Please respond using the subject from this e-mail.
>>
>

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <DEEngert@anl.gov>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444