[AFS3-std] Re: rxgk: Version numbers in XDR structures

[Jeffrey Altman]

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig66717C4AC4997F1040F72CF2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/10/2011 11:35 AM, Simon Wilkinson wrote:
> And we only have to do that if we want to say that we're still using
> XDR. If we're actually doing 'rxdr' (say), then we can do as we wish. A=
t
> this point, we don't use standard XDR libraries on any platform, and
> we've already forked from upstream by using different names for the
> numerical primitives, and adding a whole new primitive UUID type.

OpenAFS is not using standard XDR on any platform.  That doesn't mean
that other implementations are not.  The whole point of this
standardization group is to ensure that OpenAFS implementation decisions
do not become protocol decisions by fiat.






--------------enig66717C4AC4997F1040F72CF2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNeQGJAAoJENxm1CNJffh4VbQIAJviXym0+PwpRU0A19o4RNgV
Z65Z2emGKBLrJxyXSguDqIH/i4IWjzX3ZTrepjJxtMjFXFYXt2hXMsFwxcMjFqIW
zF4EwbHMVx658jx9R+AzomDNSSbsOwSkrUE0n937rUjxPuL6DAwZ0OZOazzgcUjL
txwdLJxDm4fIxPEQkWYVNuZRiuhCTWXlq8V/hM+nbRLp9tjYBN8mWbPZ155J9jd5
dQqGwqvcVVbg3NEhVvjpepTXIiOvudQoIyZeMiPJ6nxtEW19m3QErzZEJiPCSqVW
NFgK9qGcvG4SwZYeJ128C1SXy944/TD6M2VVQ/cz+fvR8qTG7LeVOjNiGgOpeMw=
=N7Rm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig66717C4AC4997F1040F72CF2--