[AFS3-std] Re: [rfc-ise] AFS3 Standardization and Independent Submissions

[Douglas E. Engert]

Three names have now been sent to the ISE as possible reviewers.
(I cc'ed them on the note I sent to the ISE, also stating the
paragraph below also looks OK.

The ball is in the ISE's court.

On 5/3/2011 3:39 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
>
> On 5/3/2011 2:19 PM, Andrew Deason wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 May 2011 10:26:56 -0500
>> "Douglas E. Engert"<deengert@anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> Nevil Browmlee has responded to our query about getting
>>> our AFS3 documents published. I have responded with the note below,
>>> but want input from the group:
>>>
>>> Is the paragraph below OK?
>>
>> Looks fine to me.
>>
>>> Who could we get as independent reviewers of the documents?
>>
>> I think I am missing something here. Does the phrase "independent
>> reviewer" mean something specific and special in the IETF independent
>> submissions process? I thought having independent reviewers looking over
>> the doc is what we've _been_ doing for the past few months.
>
> We have in effect been a WG. The IETF will get additional people
> to look over documents, but as Jeff pointed out they could be
> part of the WG.
>
> Having someone not familiar with AFS might help catch some issues
> where the authors and WG where too close to the subject, and made
> some assumptions that a future developer might misinterpret.
>
> Do we have anyone we could call on? Maybe someone who uses AFS,
> is involved with the IETF, but has not been part of the group?
>
>>
>

-- 

  Douglas E. Engert  <DEEngert@anl.gov>
  Argonne National Laboratory
  9700 South Cass Avenue
  Argonne, Illinois  60439
  (630) 252-5444