[AFS3-std] Re: IBM will not re-license OpenAFS .xg files

[Russ Allbery]

Tom Keiser <tkeiser@sinenomine.net> writes:

> Agreed.  However, if we utilize expediency as a filter,
> draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names (now that we have resolutions to
> the .xg IPR question, and concomitant stall at the ISE),
> draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk, and draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-afs seem, at
> least to me, excellent candidates for consensus work in the near term.

Wholeheartedly agreed.  If folks feel like they can drive the process
forward, those would be excellent places to start.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>