[AFS3-std] Re: IBM will not re-license OpenAFS .xg files

[Andrew Deason]

On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 01:48:38 -0400
Tom Keiser <tkeiser@sinenomine.net> wrote:

> Agreed.  However, if we utilize expediency as a filter,
> draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names (now that we have resolutions
> to the .xg IPR question, and concomitant stall at the ISE),
> draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk, and draft-wilkinson-afs3-rxgk-afs seem, at
> least to me, excellent candidates for consensus work in the near term.

If we take the approach of focusing on 1 document at a time,
draft-brashear-afs3-pts-extended-names sounds like a good first one to
me. However, is there anything I (or other "reviewers") could possibly
do? My "next task" on that for the past year or so has been to wait
for... I don't even know 'who' anymore.

(Realistically, "1 doc at a time" doesn't need to actually be _one_ doc,
but a small fixed number keeps seeming like a good idea.)

-- 
Andrew Deason
adeason@sinenomine.net