[OpenAFS-devel] Re: [OpenAFS] 2.6 kernel support anytime soon? Workarounds?

Neulinger, Nathan nneul@umr.edu
Mon, 10 May 2004 12:51:53 -0500


That sounds a lot like some of the patches that were already written
did. Didn't do much good then either.=20

-- Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nneul@umr.edu
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-6679
UMR Information Technology             Fax: (573) 341-4216
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openafs-devel-admin@openafs.org=20
> [mailto:openafs-devel-admin@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Pete Zaitcev
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 12:51 PM
> To: Garrett Wollman
> Cc: openafs-devel@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: [OpenAFS] 2.6 kernel support=20
> anytime soon? Workarounds?
>=20
> On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:47:32 -0400 (EDT)
> Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>=20
> > <<On Mon, 10 May 2004 13:25:05 -0400, "chas williams=20
> (contractor)" <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil> said:
> >=20
> > > i imagine this would be violating the spirit of=20
> export_symbol_gpl().
> >=20
> > On the other hand, you could write a shim layer that implements a
> > cross-platform API for security-label management.  Then it=20
> could also
> > be made to work under FreeBSD as well, and the GPL weenies wouldn't
> > have a leg to stand on.
>=20
> Send me patches when you're done, I'll have a look.
>=20
> -- Pete
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>=20
>=20