[OpenAFS-devel] ./configure for smp linux24 system

[Pucky Loucks]

thanks Jeffrey,

I changed the afs.rc script to

KERNEL_VERSION=`uname -r | sed 's/smp//g'`

and it now tries to load the right module that was created

I'll move to 1.4.0-rc8 now. ;)  Thanks for the clarification

Pucky

On 19-Oct-05, at 1:49 PM, Jeffrey Altman wrote:

> OpenAFS currently uses the Linux numbering scheme in which odd minor
> releases are unstable and even minor releases are stable.  Therefore,
> 1.4.0 is the new stable branch and after 1.4.0 is announced a 1.5.0
> unstable series will begin.
>
> I can't answer your linux question but I can point out that 1.4.0-rc8
> supercedes 1.3.87 by nine releases.   You should be using 1.4.0-rc8  
> and
> not 1.3.87 for any work you are currently doing.
>
> Jeffrey Altman
>
>
> Pucky Loucks wrote:
>
>> I'm having an issue with openafs-1.3.87.  I've compiled it on the
>> following type of system:
>>
>> $ Linux H2STBiznode02 2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jun 30 10:52:34
>> CDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>
>> when I try to start openafs (during a client install) I get the   
>> following:
>>
>> AFS module /usr/vice/etc/modload/libafs-2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp.mp.o does
>> not exist. Not starting AFS.
>>
>> My question is... how do I tell ./configure to build me a smp version
>> of the openafs module? I've done this:
>>
>> $ ./configure --enable-transarc-paths --enable-smp
>>
>> but I'm not sure if that is anywhere close to  being correct.
>>
>> also when 1.40 is final and out will it be the current stable release
>> or will it be unstable release.  the reason I ask is I'm going to be
>> going production with openafs in the next 3 weeks and I'm  
>> wondering  if
>> I should do openafs-1.2.13 or openafs-1.3.87 or openafs-1.4.
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Pucky
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
>> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
>> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>