[OpenAFS-devel] ./configure for smp linux24 system

[Pucky Loucks]

So I just downloaded the source for openafs-1.4.0-rc8 and that  
openafs.spec file, needed patches and src files, I'm building rpm for  
the latest code. Will I run into an issue? i.e. have the krb or other  
patches changed?  (just building rpms now)

thanks,

Pucky

On 19-Oct-05, at 2:57 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:

> http://dl.openafs.org/dl/candidate/1.4.0-rc5/
>
> Quoting Pucky Loucks <ploucks@h2st.com>:
>
>
>> I have not tried the rpms for RHEL... .but I would love too..   
>> any  url for them?
>>
>> Pucky
>>
>> On 19-Oct-05, at 1:58 PM, Derek Atkins wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Pucky,
>>>
>>> Have you tried using the 1.4.0rc RPMS for RHEL?
>>>
>>> -derek
>>>
>>> Quoting Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> OpenAFS currently uses the Linux numbering scheme in which odd  
>>>> minor
>>>> releases are unstable and even minor releases are stable.   
>>>> Therefore,
>>>> 1.4.0 is the new stable branch and after 1.4.0 is announced a 1.5.0
>>>> unstable series will begin.
>>>>
>>>> I can't answer your linux question but I can point out that  
>>>> 1.4.0-rc8
>>>> supercedes 1.3.87 by nine releases.   You should be using 1.4.0-  
>>>> rc8 and
>>>> not 1.3.87 for any work you are currently doing.
>>>>
>>>> Jeffrey Altman
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pucky Loucks wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm having an issue with openafs-1.3.87.  I've compiled it on the
>>>>> following type of system:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ Linux H2STBiznode02 2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jun 30  
>>>>> 10:52:34
>>>>> CDT 2005 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>>>>>
>>>>> when I try to start openafs (during a client install) I get  
>>>>> the   following:
>>>>>
>>>>> AFS module /usr/vice/etc/modload/ 
>>>>> libafs-2.4.21-32.0.1.ELsmp.mp.o  does
>>>>> not exist. Not starting AFS.
>>>>>
>>>>> My question is... how do I tell ./configure to build me a smp   
>>>>> version
>>>>> of the openafs module? I've done this:
>>>>>
>>>>> $ ./configure --enable-transarc-paths --enable-smp
>>>>>
>>>>> but I'm not sure if that is anywhere close to  being correct.
>>>>>
>>>>> also when 1.40 is final and out will it be the current stable   
>>>>> release
>>>>> or will it be unstable release.  the reason I ask is I'm going  
>>>>> to be
>>>>> going production with openafs in the next 3 weeks and I'm   
>>>>> wondering  if
>>>>> I should do openafs-1.2.13 or openafs-1.3.87 or openafs-1.4.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Pucky
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
>>>>> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
>>>>> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
>>>       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
>>>       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
>>>       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenAFS-devel mailing list
>>> OpenAFS-devel@openafs.org
>>> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
>       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
>       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
>       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
>       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available
>
>
>
>