[OpenAFS-devel] Which delta corresponds to 1.5.18?
Derrick J Brashear
shadow@dementia.org
Thu, 10 May 2007 17:46:19 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 10 May 2007, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
>> you don't. no delta contains the entire source for a release or even all
>> the patches since the last one. nor is the delta that updates the version
>> strings necessarily the last delta that went in before tagging.
>>
>> you need to look at the cvs tag. there's no other answer.
>
> Okay, okay.. cvs20hg reads in the RCS files and tries to infer which
> files were committed at about the same time. It then dumps a whole bunch
> of file changes in a changeset in mercurial. It does this only on one
> branch at a time.
>
> So this is what I get in my mercurial repository:
>
> changeset: 4851:af8525c24fc4
> tag: tip
> user: shadow
> date: Thu May 10 00:15:57 2007 +0000
> summary: DELTA vos-namelen-for-dump-restore-is-stupid-20070509
>
> changeset: 4850:46f7d864babf
> user: rra
> date: Tue May 08 22:49:44 2007 +0000
> summary: DELTA ka-forwarder-licensing-20070508
>
> changeset: 4849:853dcded1b5b
> user: rra
> date: Mon May 07 19:16:02 2007 +0000
> summary: DELTA quickstart-pam-docs-20070507
>
> changeset: 4848:968f233d7859
> user: rra
> date: Mon May 07 17:17:42 2007 +0000
> summary: DELTA up-preserve-dir-mtime-20070507
>
>
> What I want to know is which of the these mercurial revisions (which
> most all of match up with a delta), will be equivalent to the
> Openafs_1_5_18 tag
we don't track that information. worse (and it's my fault) a few times
deltas spanned a tag under the same delta name. we will probably go fix
the repository by hand at some point.