[OpenAFS-devel] Which delta corresponds to 1.5.18?

Derrick J Brashear shadow@dementia.org
Thu, 10 May 2007 17:46:19 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 10 May 2007, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:

>> you don't. no delta contains the entire source for a release or even all
>> the patches since the last one. nor is the delta that updates the version
>> strings necessarily the last delta that went in before tagging.
>>
>> you need to look at the cvs tag. there's no other answer.
>
> Okay, okay.. cvs20hg reads in the RCS files and tries to infer which
> files were committed at about the same time. It then dumps a whole bunch
> of file changes in a changeset in mercurial. It does this only on one
> branch at a time.
>
> So this is what I get in my mercurial repository:
>
> changeset:   4851:af8525c24fc4
> tag:         tip
> user:        shadow
> date:        Thu May 10 00:15:57 2007 +0000
> summary:     DELTA vos-namelen-for-dump-restore-is-stupid-20070509
>
> changeset:   4850:46f7d864babf
> user:        rra
> date:        Tue May 08 22:49:44 2007 +0000
> summary:     DELTA ka-forwarder-licensing-20070508
>
> changeset:   4849:853dcded1b5b
> user:        rra
> date:        Mon May 07 19:16:02 2007 +0000
> summary:     DELTA quickstart-pam-docs-20070507
>
> changeset:   4848:968f233d7859
> user:        rra
> date:        Mon May 07 17:17:42 2007 +0000
> summary:     DELTA up-preserve-dir-mtime-20070507
>
>
> What I want to know is which of the these mercurial revisions (which
> most all of match up with a delta), will be equivalent to the
> Openafs_1_5_18 tag

we don't track that information. worse (and it's my fault) a few times 
deltas spanned a tag under the same delta name. we will probably go fix 
the repository by hand at some point.