[OpenAFS-devel] YDL 5.0.2... it gets weirder
Derrick Brashear
shadow@gmail.com
Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:13:39 -0400
------=_Part_21337_26285175.1192562019274
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 10/16/07, Atro Tossavainen <atro.tossavainen+openafs@helsinki.fi> wrote:
>
> Russ,
>
> > pam_afs isn't going to work on any Linux platform other than i386
> > unless you build all of the libraries PIC.
>
> I don't remember having to do anything special to get it to work on
> YDL 2.3. It was an earlier version of OpenAFS, of course. Is there
> a reason why the libraries aren't being built PIC in any case?
archive libraries don't always work when compiled PIC and we haven't
exhaustively tested.
------=_Part_21337_26285175.1192562019274
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/16/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Atro Tossavainen</b> <<a href="mailto:atro.tossavainen+openafs@helsinki.fi">atro.tossavainen+openafs@helsinki.fi</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Russ,<br><br>> pam_afs isn't going to work on any Linux platform other than i386<br>> unless you build all of the libraries PIC.<br><br>I don't remember having to do anything special to get it to work on<br>
YDL 2.3. It was an earlier version of OpenAFS, of course. Is there<br>a reason why the libraries aren't being built PIC in any case?</blockquote><div><br>archive libraries don't always work when compiled PIC and we haven't exhaustively tested.
<br></div><br></div><br>
------=_Part_21337_26285175.1192562019274--