[OpenAFS-devel] Autoconf 2.60 requirement
Rod Widdowson
rdw@steadingsoftware.com
Fri, 7 May 2010 09:21:08 +0100
> > I strongly support requiring newer versions of Autoconf rather than
using
> > inferior probes or reinventing the wheel, particularly when they're
> > already nearly four years old. =A0Autoconf is improving =
significantly in
> > ways that require one to maintain far less code in each package. =
=A0If one
> > absolutely must do development on a very slow-releasing platform =
with
> > outdated software, Autoconf is trivial to install (assuming that M4
isn't
> > so ancient that it can't run Autoconf).
>=20
> 2.60 requires newer than just "not ancient", apparently.
Not sure I buy that: RHEL/Centos5 is the most recent enterprise =
offering, so
it's going to be around for a _long_ time and it is currently pegged at
1.59. I'd be the first to admit that I don't understand these things, =
but
we probably need to make sure that people _deploying on_ enterprise
operating systems are not disenfranchised.
=20
> I don't care, but it's worth noting.
I guess I care personally only in that I wasted a day in an ultimately
fruitless attempt to get a recent autoconf/m4 onto my Centos 5 build
environment. If anyone has a proven working recipe they'd like to share
(no, the fc srpms don't 'just work') I'd be grateful (like I say, I =
don't do
a lot of this). I'll even put it into the wiki if people think that =
would
help.
/Rod