[OpenAFS-devel] Re: mod_waklog sourceforge project

[Adam Megacz]

I apologize for taking, um, two and a half months (!) to do this... =
ktdreyer is now an admin for the mod_waklog project on sourceforge.  Let =
me know if there's anything else I should do.

  - a


On Aug 31, 2012, at 1:53 PM, Adam Megacz wrote:
> Okay, I will add ktdreyer as a project admin as soon as the =
sourceforge staff restore my access to my account.
>=20
>  - a
>=20
>=20
> On Aug 30, 2012, at 9:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>> Hi Adam,
>>=20
>> Thanks for letting me know. I just don't want these patches to get =
lost.
>>=20
>> - Ken
>>=20
>> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 7:40 PM, Adam Megacz <megacz@cs.berkeley.edu> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> Hi Ken,
>>>=20
>>> Unfortunately I am really swamped right now and won't be able to =
deal with the patches for at least a few weeks.
>>>=20
>>> I am fine with you having access to the sourceforge project, but =
it's not solely my call.... I made a bunch of improvements to =
mod_waklog, but it's really the UMich and UMBC peoples's baby.  I'm =
CC'ing them and the openafs list in case their email addresses have =
changed; if they are okay with it I'm happy to hand over the project to =
you.
>>>=20
>>> - a
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Aug 16, 2012, at 2:06 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
>>>> Hey Adam,
>>>>=20
>>>> There's a couple patches floating around for mod_waklog. I'm not =
sure
>>>> what your current availability is - do you have time to merge these
>>>> into the upstream repository on SourceForge?
>>>>=20
>>>> If you're very busy, could you give me commit access? My =
SourceForge
>>>> username is ktdreyer.
>>>>=20
>>>> - Ken
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer@ktdreyer.com>
>>>> Date: Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:03 AM
>>>> Subject: patches for mod_waklog
>>>> To: Aaron Knister <aaronk@umbc.edu>
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Hi Aaron,
>>>>=20
>>>> I'm packaging up mod_waklog for Fedora, and I saw your patches on =
your
>>>> website [1]. Thanks for publishing these! I had two questions:
>>>>=20
>>>> 1) In the _GNU_SOURCE patch, would it be simpler to reduce that =
"ifdef
>>>> _GNU_SOURCE + else" to an "ifndef" ?
>>>>=20
>>>> 2) Did you try to get these patches upstream? I would like to get =
them
>>>> into the official git repo on SourceForge if possible.
>>>>=20
>>>> - Ken
>>>>=20
>>>> http://userpages.umbc.edu/~aaronk/waklog/
>>>=20
>=20