[OpenAFS-Doc] docbook conversion update

[Russ Allbery]

"chas williams <- CONTRACTOR" <chas@cmf.nrl.navy.mil>> writes:
> Russ Allbery writes:

>> having really solid man pages; I don't find that sort of index to be
>> that useful, or printing out large sheafs of man pages that useful.
>> That being

> it might be useful for others who are not as wise in the ways of afs.
> an index can be helpful in finding the right "word".  besides, i hate to
> loose information.  someone indexed the man pages it would be nice to
> keep that work.

Yeah, that's a good point.  I'd hate to lose work.

>> For the sort of index entries that are actually useful, I doubt you
>> want to use X<>; indexing the page names will give you 90% of what's
>> actually of interest for the man pages.

> as long as you simply preserve the existing IDX tags i dont see a
> problem.  i can provide a mapping from IDXNNN to a string.  even if you
> didnt in your initial conversion, it probably wouldnt be too difficult
> to go back through and reinsert them.

Yeah, that shouldn't be too bad.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>