[OpenAFS-Doc] Re: [OpenAFS] Documentation - again

[Michael D. Norwick]

Jeffrey Altman wrote:

>Michael:
>
>The documentation project is being run by Esther <mizmoose@gmail.com>.
>There is a mailing list dedicated to the effort.  You can subscribe
>and view the archives at:
>
>	https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-doc
>
>There is a cvs tree with the IBM sources.   Currently the focus is on
>determining which of the various source formats will support all of the
>desired outputs while still providing a significant ease of use.   Once
>the sources to the documents are brought current it must be possible for
>the developers to make changes easily.  Otherwise, the documentation
>simply will not get updated in a timely manner.
>
>If you can contribute to the evaluation, that would be quite helpful.
>
>Jeffrey Altman
>
>
>Michael Norwick wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Well,
>>
>>No word yet on what if anything needs to be done for AFS documentation. 
>>I am willing to give DocBook a whirl if
>>it is deemed needed or acceptable by the group.  I am trying to trash
>>FC4 test 3 on a server right now but I could begin
>>as soon as I get this thing back up under Debian stable, have access to
>>the docs, and a sense of direction i.e. 'a clue'.
>>I've considered the depth and breadth of the IBM/Transarc docs but we
>>have to start somewhere.  Or, maybe I don't
>>have to eat the whole elephant in one sitting.  Let me know what you
>>want, or, I could just go and play with the
>>NFSv4 people.
>>
>>Good Day,
>>Michael
>>_______________________________________________
>>OpenAFS-info mailing list
>>OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>>https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>>    
>>
So, I pose the question again.  Where and when do I start?

Michael