[OpenAFS] porting to a new architecture?

[Neulinger, Nathan]

I think from what I remember, the 'kernel' portion of arla is a lot simpler,
so for a first go, it might be easier to port, but it's definately slower.

-- Nathan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Vincent - 409-974-3678 [mailto:thomasv@apple.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 12:17 PM
> To: Jacob Gorm Hansen
> Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] porting to a new architecture?
> 
> 
> I believe AFS has been ported to more platforms then Arla has.
> 
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jacob Gorm Hansen wrote:
> 
> > I would suggest looking into the Arla AFS client, since it 
> seems more
> > self-contained and has already been ported to lots of platforms.
> >
> > Best,
> > Jacob
> > --
> > always always avoid redundancy
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenAFS-info mailing list
> > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>