[OpenAFS] newbie question: coda vs openafs

[Mike Carifio]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C1B06C.23957B00
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I've read a little about openafs and coda, a file system
that started with afs and "extended it" to deal with
"disconnected access". Could someone summarize the
differences between them and where one is "better"
(more suited, performs better, easier to use, easier
to administer) than the other? Thanks.
 

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C1B06C.23957B00
Content-Type: text/x-vcard;
	name="Mike Carifio.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename="Mike Carifio.vcf"

BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Carifio;Mike
FN:Mike Carifio
ORG:Understanding Systems
TEL;WORK;VOICE:(508) 631-6448
TEL;WORK;FAX:(603) 688-0470
URL:
URL:http://www.usys.com/
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:carifio@usys.com
REV:20010223T013048Z
END:VCARD

------=_NextPart_000_0006_01C1B06C.23957B00--