[OpenAFS] Some questions about the future of OpenAFS

[Derrick J Brashear]

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Ken Hornstein wrote:

> >The beauty of SPNEGO is as long as you provide the overlying SPNEGO layer
> >as long as I share an underlying mech with each site I wish to
> >authenticate to, I'm fine. It doesn't have to be the same one.
> 
> I do wonder in practice if anyone is going to support more than _one_
> SPNEGO mechanism at a time 

Unknown.

> (I also wonder if anyone other than Microsoft
> is going to support SPNEGO, but that's a seperate problem :-) ).

Heimdal.

-D