[OpenAFS] Extremely poor write performance.
Stephen Joyce
stephen@physics.unc.edu
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:22:50 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Neulinger, Nathan wrote:
> Alternatively, might be worth providing a set of afsfsperf binaries on
> the openafs or grand.central.org sites. Then it becomes much more
> reasonable to tell someone to "go run afsfsperf".
As someone with a healthy interest in AFS buy zero experience with arla,
that would be much appreciated.
Cheers,
Stephen
--
Stephen Joyce
Systems Administrator P A N I C
Physics & Astronomy Department Physics & Astronomy
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Network Infrastructure
voice: (919) 962-7214 and Computing
fax: (919) 962-0480 http://www.panic.unc.edu
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jimmy Engelbrecht [mailto:jimmy@e.kth.se]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 2:57 PM
> > To: Robin Yamaguchi
> > Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org
> > Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Extremely poor write performance.
> >
> >
> > Robin Yamaguchi <rhy@physics.ucsb.edu> writes:
> >
> > > Hello All:
> > >
> > > I started working with openafs about a month ago, and i'm
> > having problems
> > > with write performance. Please excuse any omitted
> > information that is
> > > important - i'm a newbie. =)
> > >
> > > Here are some of the results from running bonnie++ (HD/filesystem
> > > benchmarker) on an afs directory:
> > >
> > > ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
> > > -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> > > Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> > > 496M 2351 24 2516 9 772 2 2793 25 3480 2 43.6 0
> > > ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
> > > -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
> > > files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP
> > > 16 159 26 2013 82 198 18 162 28 1013 70 215 15
> >
> > I dont think bonnie is a relevant benchmark for network filesystem.
> >
> > Have you tried something like:
> >
> > 1) Extract a tarball
> > 2) compile a program
> >
> > Or maybe you should try the andrew benchmark, which is more
> > relvant but
> > very old.
> >
> > However if your are intressted in afs-performace-numbers you
> > can compare
> > with mine, statistics are done with afsfsparf from the
> > arla-package. This
> > is relevant when you test fileserver-performance, it does not
> > performancetests client-performace.
> >
> http://www.e.kth.se/~jimmy/afsfsperf/afsfsperf.html
>
> /Jimmy
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>