[OpenAFS] Re: rough timeline for 1.4.x

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:20:29AM -0500, Derrick J Brashear wrote:
> well, what usually happens is everyone enters their own and doesn't bother 
> to check, so you're doing better than most. but no, i didn't see one 
> either. the only disk cache and only near 100% are probably the 
> significant facts, but i can't think why yet. i want to get all this 
> worked out so i can integrate the split dcache work, but i'm not going to 
> do it while there are already problems with dcache.

Filed as bug id #16965

<http://rt.central.org/rt/Ticket/Display.html?id=16965>

Hope this is helpful.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>