[OpenAFS] 1.3.x memcache performance

Horst Birthelmer horst@riback.net
Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:14:34 +0100


On Dec 27, 2004, at 6:05 PM, Kris Van Hees wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 05:52:21PM +0100, Horst Birthelmer wrote:
>> If writebehind is turned on (what I just don't assume) then what do 
>> you
>> get??
>> The numbers won't be of any significance at all.
>
> Correct, which is what I meant.  If it is turned out, you'll get 
> (probably)
> very nice throughput numbers that are meaningless.
>
>> With the sync-on-close "on" you know how fast your client will be on a
>> normal, unspectacular, daily usage.
>> IMHO that's the average speed you'll have to expect from that system
>> afterwards in production.
>
> Correct, which is indeed also what I meant.

Oh, then maybe I got you wrong.
That's why I appended the statement below. ;-)

>
>> Did I miss something?? Are we here in a client speed contest?? ;-)
>
> Well, I hope we're not since it is pointless, whichever way you look 
> at it.
> I do care about performance numbers though, since it helps with the 
> analysis
> that's going on.
>

Yes, but I think we missed answering the real question in the first 
place :-)

Horst