[OpenAFS] Read-only issues
Todd M. Lewis
Todd_Lewis@unc.edu
Mon, 01 Nov 2004 13:26:49 -0500
Derek Harkness wrote:
> Correct I'm replicating my home volumes. My solution to not having
> read-write replication is just releasing the volumes every couple of
> minutes or whenever they need to be released.
[Sigh] This is not recommended.
> But if that isn't possible or not recommended then AFS is really
> quite useless for user home directories.
Actually, AFS is really quite usefull for user home directories for a
host of reasons you may not be aware of yet. But it doesn't do what
you're trying to do in this case.
> The whole we're moving to AFS was to offer fully
> redundant home space, if a server crashed the rw volumes on would go
> off-line and the users would switch to the read-only copies allowing
> them to at least read the files.
That would be a good solution if (1) servers were unreliable enough to
justify that kind of effort and (2) AFS worked that way. Neither of
those things is true.
--
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
/ Todd_Lewis@unc.edu 919-962-5273 http://www.unc.edu/~utoddl /
/ My wife really likes to make pottery, /
/ but to me it's just kiln time. /
+--------------------------------------------------------------+