[OpenAFS] Running OpenAFS in Vmware ESX host
Neulinger, Nathan
nneul@umr.edu
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:34:41 -0600
It only obliterates it if you have ONE vmware system.=20
We are doing this for our afs database servers and have 10 DELL 2650's
virtualizing approximately 100 linux and windows servers, with plenty of
room to spare.
-- Nathan
------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger EMail: nneul@umr.edu
University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-6679
UMR Information Technology Fax: (573) 341-4216
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: openafs-info-admin@openafs.org=20
> [mailto:openafs-info-admin@openafs.org] On Behalf Of Derek Atkins
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:26 AM
> To: Matthew Cocker
> Cc: openafs-info
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Running OpenAFS in Vmware ESX host
>=20
> Matthew Cocker <matt@cs.auckland.ac.nz> writes:
>=20
> > Hi
> >
> > We are presently moving a lot of our infrastructure servers into
> > Vmware ESX virtual machines. At the moment we are testing OpenAFS
> > fileservers and DB as virtual machines (sans backend). Is=20
> anyone else
> > tried this in production yet?
>=20
> I have heard of people doing it, but frankly it doesn't buy you
> anything unless you're trying to put multiple AFS cells onto the same
> hardware.
>=20
> The redundancy you get by having multiple AFS servers is obliterated
> by VMware -- if the physical machine crashes you lose ALL the afs
> servers on that host machine. Not really the redundancy you're
> looking for. So, if you want the redundancy you need separate
> physical machines anyways, at which point why run the AFS server in a
> virtual machine?
>=20
> -derek
> --=20
> Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
> Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB)
> URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
> warlord@MIT.EDU PGP key available
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>=20
>=20