[OpenAFS] Limitations?

ed ed@ednevitible.co.uk
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:43:34 +0100


--Signature_Sun__3_Jul_2005_20_43_34_+0100_M_vdKJrRTmqqwKR9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:49:21 -0700
John Anderson <johnha@ccbill.com> wrote:

> I'm fairly new to working with AFS and I previously worked with CODA.=20
>=20
> The reason I'm looking more into AFS now is because a strict limit
> CODA  enforces on directory sizes.  This limits the numbers of files
> that can  be stored under a directory in a volume.  I've come across
> an instance  where I need to store about 10,000 files in one directory
> for an  application.  Is there any such limitation to the number of
> files in a  directory as far as AFS is concerned?

There can be only one read/write node for a volume. Because of this I am
in two minds of using AFS for DRBD. I *really* need a system where I can
use multiple read/write nodes, for resilience.

--=20
http://edd.link9.net - http://irc.is-cool.net

--Signature_Sun__3_Jul_2005_20_43_34_+0100_M_vdKJrRTmqqwKR9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCyD/mjtZArFPJ/GwRAsnYAJ0QiT3fVQ0zOU6wahR/+dT1/qWEeQCfSah3
VPbcWG7K5CSnIx0EZOw79IM=
=nXLf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Sun__3_Jul_2005_20_43_34_+0100_M_vdKJrRTmqqwKR9--