[OpenAFS] Limitations?
ed
ed@ednevitible.co.uk
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:43:34 +0100
--Signature_Sun__3_Jul_2005_20_43_34_+0100_M_vdKJrRTmqqwKR9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 11:49:21 -0700
John Anderson <johnha@ccbill.com> wrote:
> I'm fairly new to working with AFS and I previously worked with CODA.=20
>=20
> The reason I'm looking more into AFS now is because a strict limit
> CODA enforces on directory sizes. This limits the numbers of files
> that can be stored under a directory in a volume. I've come across
> an instance where I need to store about 10,000 files in one directory
> for an application. Is there any such limitation to the number of
> files in a directory as far as AFS is concerned?
There can be only one read/write node for a volume. Because of this I am
in two minds of using AFS for DRBD. I *really* need a system where I can
use multiple read/write nodes, for resilience.
--=20
http://edd.link9.net - http://irc.is-cool.net
--Signature_Sun__3_Jul_2005_20_43_34_+0100_M_vdKJrRTmqqwKR9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCyD/mjtZArFPJ/GwRAsnYAJ0QiT3fVQ0zOU6wahR/+dT1/qWEeQCfSah3
VPbcWG7K5CSnIx0EZOw79IM=
=nXLf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature_Sun__3_Jul_2005_20_43_34_+0100_M_vdKJrRTmqqwKR9--