[OpenAFS] Documetation for asetkey and aklog

[ted creedon]

There's a couple of docbook texts available but I'm out of time until
winter.

It would be advisable to investigate converting the IBM.htm directly into
docbook xml. The trouble with the Latex conversion is the reserved
characters (# . \ etc) in the htm don't map cleanly into Latex.

I suspect that docbook will never produce typeset pdf documents as
professional as Latex but the html should be acceptable. Knuth's Tex
algorithms are still the best.

Regarding Latex->html, the latex2html converter produces unacceptable
output, tth does much better but is licensed.

tedc

-----Original Message-----
From: openafs-info-admin@openafs.org [mailto:openafs-info-admin@openafs.org]
On Behalf Of Esther Filderman
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:56 AM
To: openafs-info@openafs.org; openafs-doc@openafs.org
Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Documetation for asetkey and aklog

The html that the latex is putting out is not very clean.  I'm looking at
DocBook [or will finish doing so once my dead AFS server is revived
-- oh the irony!] as a possibilty.  If it passes muster [mainly, can it put
out clean output AND be easy enough to use] I'll look into converting your
Latex into DocBook.

If it's evil, we may stick with Latex.


On 7/8/05, ted creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.com> wrote:
> 1. Yes.
> 2. He doesn't have time.
> 3. It can be in html and pdf.
> 4. Its more readable than before. The index is very helpful.
> 5. It took 1 hour to convert.
> 6. What is the documentation plan for the 1.4 release?
> 
> tedc
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Esther Filderman [mailto:mizmoose@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 9:35 AM
> To: ted creedon
> Cc: openafs-info@openafs.org; openafs-doc@openafs.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenAFS] Documetation for asetkey and aklog
> 
> Did you even ask Ken first before mucking with his file(s)?
> 
> Please do not latex-ify the AFS FAQ.
> 
> e.
> 
> 
> On 7/8/05, ted creedon <tcreedon@easystreet.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Ken Hornstein's FAQ is now in Latex format. Perhaps an update would 
> > be in order for 1.4?
> >
> > Obsolete docs and links are a real problem.
> >
> > tedc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenAFS-info mailing list
> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>
_______________________________________________
OpenAFS-info mailing list
OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info