[OpenAFS] 1.4.x fileserver crashes on amd64_linux2X when tracing turned on
Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:26:43 -0500
I'm opposed to nested includes because it makes it difficult to diagnose
include ordering violations but I realize that's a losing battle.
I actually wonder why hardly anybody uses the '%I' format instead
which util/snprintf.c understands - perhaps because a move to IPv6 (if
ever) would be more complicated?
I suspect snprintf was added after most of these callers were written to use
inet_ntoa. They could safely be changed now but no one has bothered.