[OpenAFS] afs on windows problem

Robbie Foust rfoust@duke.edu
Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:21:38 -0500


Thanks for the info.  I've bumped it up to 60 seconds, but it didn't=20
help any.  I have 14 of these events so far today.  I guess its really=20
not a big deal since the client still seems to work fine and since you=20
already know what causes it.

- Robbie


Jeffrey Altman wrote:

>The warning is caused because the CIFS client timed out before the RX
>request to the file server completed.   This is not unusual.  The RX
>request will complete when it completes and the CIFS client will create
>a new connection.
>
>You can try increasing the minimum timeout period for the CIFS client
>in order to reduce the number of these errors.  The default timeout
>period is 45 seconds.
>
>>From the OpenAFS release notes:
>
>[HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\lanmanworkstation\parameters]
>SessTimeout
>
>If the minimum SMB timeout is not specified the value is 45 seconds.
>See http://support.microsoft.com:80/support/kb/articles/Q102/0/67.asp
>
>Jeffrey Altman
>
>
>Robbie Foust wrote:
> =20
>
>>I've updated my terminal server to RC10 last night. This morning I see
>>about 5 event log entries that were logged throughout the morning that
>>show this (pasted below). What is the best way to figure out what is
>>causing this warning?
>>
>>Event Type: Warning
>>Event Source: AFS Client
>>Event Category: None
>>Event ID: 1005
>>Date: 3/22/2006
>>Time: 10:13:22 AM
>>User: N/A
>>Computer: (removed)
>>Description:
>>The description for Event ID ( 1005 ) in Source ( AFS Client ) cannot b=
e
>>found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
>>information or message DLL files to display messages from a remote
>>computer. You may be able to use the /AUXSOURCE=3D flag to retrieve thi=
s
>>description; see Help and Support for details. The following informatio=
n
>>is part of the event: Pkt straddled session startup, took 0 ms, ncb
>>length 133.
>>Data:
>>0000: ff 53 4d 42 72 00 00 00 =CB=87SMBr...
>>0008: 00 18 53 c8 00 00 00 00 ..S=C2=BB....
>>0010: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
>>0018: 00 00 ff fe 00 00 00 00 ..=CB=87=CB=9B....
>>0020: 00 62 00 02 50 43 20 4e .b..PC N
>>0028: 45 54 57 4f 52 4b 20 50 ETWORK P
>>0030: 52 4f 47 52 41 4d 20 31 ROGRAM 1
>>0038: 2e 30 00 02 4c 41 4e 4d .0..LANM
>>0040: 41 4e 31 2e 30 00 02 57 AN1.0..W
>>0048: 69 6e 64 6f 77 73 20 66 indows f
>>0050: 6f 72 20 57 6f 72 6b 67 or Workg
>>0058: 72 6f 75 70 73 20 33 2e roups 3.
>>0060: 31 61 00 02 4c 4d 31 2e 1a..LM1.
>>0068: 32 58 30 30 32 00 02 4c 2X002..L
>>0070: 41 4e 4d 41 4e 32 2e 31 ANMAN2.1
>>0078: 00 02 4e 54 20 4c 4d 20 ..NT LM
>>0080: 30 2e 31 32 00 0.12.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>>
>>   =20
>>
>>>Please send bug reports to openafs-bugs@openafs.org.
>>>Minidumps contain mucho private data and should not be published
>>>publicly.  After you file a bug report you will receive a response
>>>indicating what you should do with the dump file.
>>>
>>>in your bug report state what you mean by afsd_service.exe being
>>>unresponsive.
>>>
>>>Jeffrey Altman
>>>
>>>
>>>Robbie Foust wrote:
>>>=20
>>>
>>>     =20
>>>
>>>>Would this problem also cause the afsd_service to become
>>>>unresponsive? I created a mindump just in case (what do I do with
>>>>it?).  I'll still
>>>>upgrade to the latest RC tonight.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>- Robbie
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Robbie Foust wrote:
>>>>
>>>> =20
>>>>       =20
>>>>
>>>>>Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>   =20
>>>>>         =20
>>>>>
>>>>>>Christopher D. Clausen wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     =20
>>>>>>           =20
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I believe he said he was using build 1.4.0097.  Isn't that
>>>>>>>1.4.1-rc7? The build that marked servers as down even when they we=
re
>>>>>>>up?
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>       =20
>>>>>>>             =20
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes indeed.  Somehow that item is no longer in the changelog I keep.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The current release is 1.4.1-rc10.  Please upgrade.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     =20
>>>>>>           =20
>>>>>>
>>>>>Awesome - I'll do that tonight.   At least I know what the problem i=
s
>>>>>now though. :-)
>>>>>
>>>>>Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>- Robbie
>>>>>
>>>>>   =20
>>>>>         =20
>>>>>
>>>> =20
>>>>       =20
>>>>
>>   =20
>>


--=20
Robbie Foust, CISSP, A+
OIT - CSI
Duke University