[OpenAFS] kaserver deperecation, OpenAFS future, etc...
Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:27:15 CDT
> John Hascall wrote:
> > So can somebody in the know comment on why "ka5server"
> > wasn't the answer (for those who use kaserver)?
[...lack of resources...]
> If the answer is that you would like to see a Kerberos 5
> implementation that uses ubik for change propagation that
> is something that I'm sure could be developed and contributed
> either to MIT or to Heimdal.
We already do "real-time" change propagation,
but in a way that is specific to our needs,
so we're not interested (and I doubt anyone is
interested in what we do).
I guess I'm a little surprised that nobody was
interested enough in "ka5server" to make it
happen -- do most sites not use kaserver?