[OpenAFS] Automatic move of volumes
Derrick Brashear
shadow@gmail.com
Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:56:36 -0400
------=_Part_5036_10700150.1193234196718
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
On 10/24/07, Steven Jenkins <steven.jenkins@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/24/07, Derrick Brashear <shadow@gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
> > perl scripts exist to do it and I think have been posted here in the
> past;
> > they may even deal with the "RO already exists" case.
> >
>
> It would be nice if there were a repository of publically available
> contrib stuff like that.
>
> > the interesting case is where the RW has unreleased changes and you want
> to
> > recreate the ROs as they are now. i don't know of distributed tools to
> do
> > this.
> >
>
> I hadn't really thought about people intentionally keeping their RWs &
> ROs out of sync w/each other. I'm not clear why someone would want to
> do that -- could you elaborate?
using the RW as a the "beta" copy of data and releasing the changes after
testing them. i know of web backend services using AFS set up this way.
------=_Part_5036_10700150.1193234196718
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/24/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Steven Jenkins</b> <<a href="mailto:steven.jenkins@gmail.com">steven.jenkins@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On 10/24/07, Derrick Brashear <<a href="mailto:shadow@gmail.com">shadow@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>...<br>> perl scripts exist to do it and I think have been posted here in the past;<br>> they may even deal with the "RO already exists" case.
<br>><br><br>It would be nice if there were a repository of publically available<br>contrib stuff like that.<br><br>> the interesting case is where the RW has unreleased changes and you want to<br>> recreate the ROs as they are now. i don't know of distributed tools to do
<br>> this.<br>><br><br>I hadn't really thought about people intentionally keeping their RWs &<br>ROs out of sync w/each other. I'm not clear why someone would want to<br>do that -- could you elaborate?
</blockquote><div><br>using the RW as a the "beta" copy of data and releasing the changes after testing them. i know of web backend services using AFS set up this way.<br><br></div><br></div><br>
------=_Part_5036_10700150.1193234196718--