[OpenAFS] Re: retaining AFS-specific nameless group IDs (PAG) in `id' and `groups'

[Adam Megacz]

Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net> writes:
> Since you guys are interested in AFS, I'm hoping one of you will
> respond to the above.

http://lists.openafs.org/pipermail/openafs-info/2008-April/029132.html

> I'll wait a few days, after which, if I don't hear anything, I'll
> just revert to the old behavior.

If "old behavior" means no special action for GIDs that might be PAGs,
I think that is the right course of action.

  - a