[OpenAFS] Anyone using Solaris with Live Upgrade for fileservers?

[Rich Sudlow]

Stephen Repetski wrote:
> I've done an LU on our two main fileservers before, but we upgraded
> the AFS server on them as well. Between the time the LU completed and
> the server was upgraded (1.4.8 to 1.4.11 I believe) it seemed to work
> just as expected.
> 
> Server OS: Solaris 10 update 6 to update 7
> 
> What do you mean if the disk and memory were tested?

Hi Trey

Thanks for your response. We've been running Solaris fileservers
for a long while but haven't been using Live Update - am interested
in that in order to keep our servers up while patching.
It sounds like it actually worked for you ;-) Roughly how long
did the Live Update take?  Do you use Sun tools for the patches
or pca?

Regarding the disk/memory tested.
Were you running an AFS client? - and if so a disk cache or
memory cache?

Thanks!

Rich

> 
> ----------
> Stephen (Trey) Repetski
> skr3394@rit.edu
> skrepetski@gmail.com
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:17, Rich Sudlow <rich@nd.edu> wrote:
>> Is anyone using Solaris with Live Upgrade for fileservers?
>> What version of Solaris? Has anyone used this with a client??
>> Has both disk and memory been tested?
>>
>> Tips?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Rich
>>
>> --
>> Rich Sudlow
>> University of Notre Dame
>> Center for Research Computing
>> 128 Information Technology Center
>> PO Box 539
>> Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539
>>
>> (574) 631-7258 office phone
>> (574) 631-9283 office fax
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenAFS-info mailing list
>> OpenAFS-info@openafs.org
>> https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info
>>


-- 
Rich Sudlow
University of Notre Dame
Center for Research Computing
128 Information Technology Center
PO Box 539
Notre Dame, IN 46556-0539

(574) 631-7258 office phone
(574) 631-9283 office fax