[OpenAFS] Re: [OpenAFS-devel] Re: 1.6 and post-1.6 OpenAFS branch management and schedule
Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:21:04 -0700
Andrew Deason <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Russ Allbery <email@example.com> wrote:
>> * In the long term, we want to remove LWP and build all parts of
>> OpenAFS against POSIX pthreads. This has no time frame yet since it
>> depends on other work that's not yet complete. It obviously depends
>> on completion of the pthreaded Ubik work, which I don't believe is
>> in a state that's ready to recommend as of 1.6, so will continue to
>> be optional in that release.
> While I agree, I feel compelled to note that there aren't any known
> issues with pthreaded ubik right now (it's been removed as a newsletter
> project since it's "done"). What's required is wider testing for it to
> be more 'ready', I think.
This makes me think we should enable it by default on master once we've
branched for 1.6.
Russ Allbery (firstname.lastname@example.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>